RESUMO
Background: For nonmoyamoya patients with anterior cerebral artery (ACA) stenosis or occlusion, whether direct revascularization of the ACA territory can prevent stroke is still unclear. The objective of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of a parietal branch of superficial temporal artery-interposed superficial temporal artery-to-ACA bypass (PISAB) for preventing stroke in patients with symptomatic atherosclerotic ACA stenosis or occlusion (SAASO). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from patients with SAASO who had undergone PISAB in our center between April 2016 and November 2021. The rates of patency, satisfaction (revascularization grades A and B) of bypass, perioperative complications, recurrence of ischemic stroke, changes in bypass flow, and improvements in cerebral blood perfusion were analyzed. Results: A total of 19 SAASO patients were involved in this study. Sixteen out of 19 (84.2%) patients were free from any cerebral ischemic events after surgery. Only 3 patients (15.8%) had recurrent stroke postoperatively. Two (10.5%) surgery-related complications occurred, including hyperperfusion syndrome and minor stroke. No skin ischemic complications occurred. The average follow-up period was 50.6 ± 18.3 months. The flow rate of the bypass was significantly increased half a year after surgery (56.2 ± 8.0 mL/min vs. 44.3 ± 5.3 mL/min, p < 0.001). The ratio of ipsilateral/contralateral mean transit time in the superior frontal gyrus was decreased significantly after bypass (1.08 ± 0.07 vs. 1.23 ± 0.05, p < 0.001) and continued to decrease 6 months after surgery (1.05 ± 0.04 vs. 1.08 ± 0.07, p = 0.002). The patency rate of PISAB was 94.7% (18/19) 2 years after surgery. The satisfaction rate of bypass was 89.5% (17/19). Conclusion: The results of this study indicate that PISAB, as a safe superficial bypass, can effectively reduce the risk of stroke in SAASO patients. More precise conclusions will require randomized control studies.
RESUMO
OBJECTIVE: Management of large- or giant-sized internal carotid artery aneurysms (LICAAs) remains challenging. Whether a flow diverter device (FDD) or interventional trapping with extracranial-intracranial bypass (ITB) is better, remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis of unruptured LICAA patients treated with FDD or ITB at 3 medical centers. Both the effectiveness and safety results of FDD and ITB were compared. RESULTS: In total, 101 aneurysms in 95 patients treated with FDDs and 36 aneurysms in 36 patients managed with ITBs were included (September 2014-June 2021). There was no significant difference between the groups in the complete obliteration rate 1 year after surgery (P = 0.101). There were 2 relapse cases (2.0%) and 4 retreated cases (4.0%) in the FDD group and 1 relapse case (2.8%) and 2 retreated cases (5.6%) in the ITB group. Neither the relapse rates nor retreat rates between groups were significantly different. The neurological morbidity rates were 4.0% (4/101) and 2.8% (1/36) in the FDD group and ITB group, respectively, and were not significantly different. There was 1 mortality case in each group, and the mortality rates were not significantly different (P = 0.443). Both the perioperative and overall (perioperative plus long-term) complication rates in the FDD group were significantly lower than those in the ITB group (P = 0.033, P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: FDD had comparable surgical efficacy and a significantly lower postoperative complication rate to traditional ITB. FDD might be preferable to ITB as a treatment modality for LICAA.
